32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Building a national framework for multicentre research and clinical trials: experience from the Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance

      other
      1 , 2 , 2 , 3 , , 2 , 4 , 5 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 2 , 7 , 2 , 8 , 2 , 9 , 10 , 2 , 2 , 11 , 2 , 12 , 6 , 5 , 8 , 7 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21
      BMJ Global Health
      BMJ Publishing Group
      Cohort study, Clinical trial, Maternal health, Public Health, HIV

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is limited capacity and infrastructure in sub-Saharan Africa to conduct clinical trials for the identification of efficient and effective new prevention, diagnostic and treatment modalities to address the disproportionate burden of disease. This paper reports on the process to establish locally driven infrastructure for multicentre research and trials in Nigeria known as the Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance Model Innovation and Research Centres (NISA-MIRCs). We used a participatory approach to establish a research network of 21 high-volume health facilities selected from all 6 geopolitical zones in Nigeria capable of conducting clinical trials, implementation research using effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs and health system research. The NISA-MIRCs have a cumulative potential to recruit 60 000 women living with HIV and an age-matched cohort of HIV-uninfected women. We conducted a needs assessment, convened several stakeholder outreaches and engagement sessions, and established a governance structure. Additionally, we selected and trained a core research team, developed criteria for site selection, assessed site readiness for research and obtained ethical approval from a single national institutional review board. We used the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework to guide our reporting of the process in the development of this network. The NISA-MIRCs will provide a nationally representative infrastructure to initiate new studies, support collaborative research, inform policy decisions and thereby fill a significant research infrastructure gap in Africa’s most populous country.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners

            The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data management platform was developed in 2004 to address an institutional need at Vanderbilt University, then shared with a limited number of adopting sites beginning in 2006. Given bi-directional benefit in early sharing experiments, we created a broader consortium sharing and support model for any academic, non-profit, or government partner wishing to adopt the software. Our sharing framework and consortium-based support model have evolved over time along with the size of the consortium (currently more than 3200 REDCap partners across 128 countries). While the "REDCap Consortium" model represents only one example of how to build and disseminate a software platform, lessons learned from our approach may assist other research institutions seeking to build and disseminate innovative technologies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project

              Background Identifying, developing, and testing implementation strategies are important goals of implementation science. However, these efforts have been complicated by the use of inconsistent language and inadequate descriptions of implementation strategies in the literature. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study aimed to refine a published compilation of implementation strategy terms and definitions by systematically gathering input from a wide range of stakeholders with expertise in implementation science and clinical practice. Methods Purposive sampling was used to recruit a panel of experts in implementation and clinical practice who engaged in three rounds of a modified Delphi process to generate consensus on implementation strategies and definitions. The first and second rounds involved Web-based surveys soliciting comments on implementation strategy terms and definitions. After each round, iterative refinements were made based upon participant feedback. The third round involved a live polling and consensus process via a Web-based platform and conference call. Results Participants identified substantial concerns with 31% of the terms and/or definitions and suggested five additional strategies. Seventy-five percent of definitions from the originally published compilation of strategies were retained after voting. Ultimately, the expert panel reached consensus on a final compilation of 73 implementation strategies. Conclusions This research advances the field by improving the conceptual clarity, relevance, and comprehensiveness of implementation strategies that can be used in isolation or combination in implementation research and practice. Future phases of ERIC will focus on developing conceptually distinct categories of strategies as well as ratings for each strategy’s importance and feasibility. Next, the expert panel will recommend multifaceted strategies for hypothetical yet real-world scenarios that vary by sites’ endorsement of evidence-based programs and practices and the strength of contextual supports that surround the effort. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2022
                21 April 2022
                : 7
                : 4
                : e008241
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Health Sciences , Northeastern University , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [2 ]departmentCenter for Translation and Implementation Research (CTAIR) , University of Nigeria , Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria
                [3 ]Healthy Sunrise Foundation , Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Community Medicine , University of Nigeria , Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria
                [5 ]APIN Public Health Initiatives , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                [6 ]Institute of Human Virology Nigeria , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                [7 ]Caritas Nigeria , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                [8 ]Center for Integrated Health Programs (CIHP) , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                [9 ]departmentDepartment of Community Prevention and Care Services , National Agency for Control of AIDS (NACA) , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                [10 ]FHI360 , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                [11 ]departmentDepartment of Psychology , University of Nigeria , Nsukka, Enugu, Nigeria
                [12 ]departmentOncology Center , University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital , Ituku Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria
                [13 ]departmentNational AIDS, Viral Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Control Programme , Federal Ministry of Health , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                [14 ]departmentNational Cancer Control Programme , Federal Ministry of Health , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                [15 ]National Agency for the Control of AIDS (NACA) , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                [16 ]Federal University of Health Sciences Otukpo , Otukpo, Benue State, Nigeria
                [17 ]departmentDepartment of Epidemiology , Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [18 ]departmentCenter for Mental Health Services Research , Brown School at Washington University in St Louis , St Louis, Missouri, USA
                [19 ]departmentDepartment of Prevention and Community Health , Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University , Washington, DC, USA
                [20 ]departmentDepartment of Psychiatry , University of California, San Diego , La Jolla, California, USA
                [21 ]Center for Clinical Care and Clinical Research , Abuja, FCT, Nigeria
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Echezona Edozie Ezeanolue; eezeanolue@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-1042
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9601-0518
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8193-817X
                Article
                bmjgh-2021-008241
                10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008241
                9024272
                35450861
                f9e59e9c-938b-4d37-bc9b-ad44b68f860b
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 08 December 2021
                : 25 February 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance (NISA);
                Funded by: Healthy Sunrise Foundation;
                Funded by: Center for Translation and Implementation Science (CTAIR), University of Nigeria Nsukka;
                Categories
                Practice
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                cohort study,clinical trial,maternal health,public health,hiv

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content125

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors1,367