40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stichwort: Unterrichtsplanungskompetenz : Empirische Zugänge und Befunde Empirical approaches and findings

      ,
      Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Zusammenfassung

          Aktuell emergiert ein Feld der empirischen Bildungsforschung, das die Unterrichtsplanung als eine relevante, spezifische Aufgabe des Lehrer*innenberufs fokussiert, hierfür benötigte kognitive Fähig- und Fertigkeiten konkretisiert und diese unter Rekurs auf existierende Forschungstraditionen und -paradigmen bearbeitet. 19 ausgewählte Verfahren lassen sich – basierend auf 44 Publikationen – identifizieren und unter einer vorgeschlagenen Arbeitsdefinition zur Unterrichtsplanungskompetenz (UPK) betrachten. Vier methodische Zugänge strukturieren den vorliegenden Überblick über die entwickelten Messverfahren und die bislang erzielten empirischen Befunde: Selbsteinschätzungsverfahren, Analysen authentischer Planungsdokumente, Vignetten-, und Planungswissenstests. Konzeptionell weisen die Verfahren Binnendifferenzierungen nach Inhaltsbereichen bzw. -dimensionen aus, die begrifflich allerdings variieren. Testdiagnostische Erwartungen an die psychometrische Qualitätsprüfung der entwickelten Verfahren werden in unterschiedlichem Maße erfüllt. Die Befunde einiger Studien zeigen, dass die jeweils gemessene UPK von den bislang etablierten Facetten des Lehrer*innenprofessionswissens empirisch getrennt werden kann. Messungen der UPK in der Lehrer*innenbildung geben Hinweise auf den Erwerb bei angehenden Lehrkräften, der Nachweis einer Wirksamkeit von Lerngelegenheiten der Lehrer*innenbildung für die UPK bleibt hingegen ein Forschungsdesiderat. Ergebnisse zu Zusammenhängen mit der Unterrichtsqualität können erste Einblicke in die prognostische Validität einzelner Verfahren belegen, es fehlt indes eine systematisch angelegte Forschung zum Zusammenhang von UPK-Maßen und Merkmalen der Prozess- und Ergebnisqualität von Unterricht. Implikationen für zukünftige Forschung werden diskutiert.

          Abstract

          Currently, an area of empirical educational research has been emerging that focuses on lesson planning as a relevant, specific task of the teaching profession. For this, concrete cognitive abilities and skills are designed, with references to existing research traditions and paradigms. 19 approaches—based on 44 publications—can be identified and described using a work definition of ‘lesson planning competence’. Four methodological strands are used to structure the present review of developed measurement instruments and so far published empirical findings: self-reports, analysis of written lesson plans, vignette test, planning knowledge test. Conceptually, approaches have inner differentiations of content areas or dimensions, but their terminology varies. Test-diagnostic expectations regarding psychometric quality of developed approaches are fulfilled to varying degrees. Findings of some studies show that lesson planning competence can be empirically separated from established facets of teacher professional knowledge. Future teachers can acquire lesson planning competence according to studies using measurements during teacher education, however, evidence for the effectiveness of learning opportunities during teacher education for lesson planning competence remains a research desideratum. Findings on the correlation with instructional quality allow first insights into predictive validity of a small number of approaches. But there is a lack of systematic research on the relation between lesson planning competence and characteristics of process and outcome quality of teaching. Implications for future research are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

          Background Scoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic review or scoping review approach when synthesising evidence. The purpose of this article is to clearly describe the differences in indications between scoping reviews and systematic reviews and to provide guidance for when a scoping review is (and is not) appropriate. Results Researchers may conduct scoping reviews instead of systematic reviews where the purpose of the review is to identify knowledge gaps, scope a body of literature, clarify concepts or to investigate research conduct. While useful in their own right, scoping reviews may also be helpful precursors to systematic reviews and can be used to confirm the relevance of inclusion criteria and potential questions. Conclusions Scoping reviews are a useful tool in the ever increasing arsenal of evidence synthesis approaches. Although conducted for different purposes compared to systematic reviews, scoping reviews still require rigorous and transparent methods in their conduct to ensure that the results are trustworthy. Our hope is that with clear guidance available regarding whether to conduct a scoping review or a systematic review, there will be less scoping reviews being performed for inappropriate indications better served by a systematic review, and vice-versa.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft
                Z Erziehungswiss
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1434-663X
                1862-5215
                July 01 2022
                Article
                10.1007/s11618-022-01107-x
                02742e04-1702-435c-8126-2035ef69c63e
                © 2022

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article