38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effectiveness of Homologous and Heterologous COVID-19 Booster Doses Following 1 Ad.26.COV2.S (Janssen [Johnson & Johnson]) Vaccine Dose Against COVID-19–Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults — VISION Network, 10 States, December 2021–March 2022

      research-article
      , PhD 1 , 2 , * , , PhD 3 , 4 , * , , , MD 5 , , MHS 6 , , PhD 7 , , MBBS 8 , 9 , , MD 10 , , MD 11 , , PhD 12 , , MD 13 , 14 , , MD 5 , , PhD 3 , , DrPH 7 , , PhD 6 , 1 , , MPH 8 , , PhD 11 , , MBBS 12 , , MPH 10 , , PhD 13 , 15 , , MPP 5 , , MPH 3 , , MSc 7 , , MD 2 , 16 , 17 , , MBBS 8 , , MD 11 , , MD 12 , , MPH 10 , , DrPH 13 , , MPH 5 , , MBBS 3 , , ScD 7 , 8 , , MD 18 , 10 , , MD 13 , 19 , 3 , , PhD 7 , , PhD 10 , , PhD 3 , , MPH 3 , , MD 3 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 3 , , MPH 3 , , DPhil 3 , , MD 3 , , ScD 7 , , PhD 3 , , PhD 13 , 15
      Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Homologous and Heterologous Covid-19 Booster Vaccinations

          Abstract Background Although the three vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) that have received emergency use authorization in the United States are highly effective, breakthrough infections are occurring. Data are needed on the serial use of homologous boosters (same as the primary vaccine) and heterologous boosters (different from the primary vaccine) in fully vaccinated recipients. Methods In this phase 1–2, open-label clinical trial conducted at 10 sites in the United States, adults who had completed a Covid-19 vaccine regimen at least 12 weeks earlier and had no reported history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection received a booster injection with one of three vaccines: mRNA-1273 (Moderna) at a dose of 100 μg, Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson–Janssen) at a dose of 5×1010 virus particles, or BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) at a dose of 30 μg. The primary end points were safety, reactogenicity, and humoral immunogenicity on trial days 15 and 29. Results Of the 458 participants who were enrolled in the trial, 154 received mRNA-1273, 150 received Ad26.COV2.S, and 153 received BNT162b2 as booster vaccines; 1 participant did not receive the assigned vaccine. Reactogenicity was similar to that reported for the primary series. More than half the recipients reported having injection-site pain, malaise, headache, or myalgia. For all combinations, antibody neutralizing titers against a SARS-CoV-2 D614G pseudovirus increased by a factor of 4 to 73, and binding titers increased by a factor of 5 to 55. Homologous boosters increased neutralizing antibody titers by a factor of 4 to 20, whereas heterologous boosters increased titers by a factor of 6 to 73. Spike-specific T-cell responses increased in all but the homologous Ad26.COV2.S-boosted subgroup. CD8+ T-cell levels were more durable in the Ad26.COV2.S-primed recipients, and heterologous boosting with the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine substantially increased spike-specific CD8+ T cells in the mRNA vaccine recipients. Conclusions Homologous and heterologous booster vaccines had an acceptable safety profile and were immunogenic in adults who had completed a primary Covid-19 vaccine regimen at least 12 weeks earlier. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; DMID 21-0012 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04889209.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines in Ambulatory and Inpatient Care Settings

            Abstract Background There are limited data on the effectiveness of the vaccines against symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) currently authorized in the United States with respect to hospitalization, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), or ambulatory care in an emergency department or urgent care clinic. Methods We conducted a study involving adults (≥50 years of age) with Covid-19–like illness who underwent molecular testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We assessed 41,552 admissions to 187 hospitals and 21,522 visits to 221 emergency departments or urgent care clinics during the period from January 1 through June 22, 2021, in multiple states. The patients’ vaccination status was documented in electronic health records and immunization registries. We used a test-negative design to estimate vaccine effectiveness by comparing the odds of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 infection among vaccinated patients with those among unvaccinated patients. Vaccine effectiveness was adjusted with weights based on propensity-for-vaccination scores and according to age, geographic region, calendar time (days from January 1, 2021, to the index date for each medical visit), and local virus circulation. Results The effectiveness of full messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination (≥14 days after the second dose) was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87 to 91) against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to hospitalization, 90% (95% CI, 86 to 93) against infection leading to an ICU admission, and 91% (95% CI, 89 to 93) against infection leading to an emergency department or urgent care clinic visit. The effectiveness of full vaccination with respect to a Covid-19–associated hospitalization or emergency department or urgent care clinic visit was similar with the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines and ranged from 81% to 95% among adults 85 years of age or older, persons with chronic medical conditions, and Black or Hispanic adults. The effectiveness of the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine was 68% (95% CI, 50 to 79) against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection leading to hospitalization and 73% (95% CI, 59 to 82) against infection leading to an emergency department or urgent care clinic visit. Conclusions Covid-19 vaccines in the United States were highly effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection requiring hospitalization, ICU admission, or an emergency department or urgent care clinic visit. This vaccine effectiveness extended to populations that are disproportionately affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Waning 2-Dose and 3-Dose Effectiveness of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19–Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters and Hospitalizations Among Adults During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance — VISION Network, 10 States, August 2021–January 2022

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                01 April 2022
                01 April 2022
                : 71
                : 13
                : 495-502
                Affiliations
                Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; CDC COVID-19 Emergency Response Team; Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; Division of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Epidemiology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon; Westat, Rockville, Maryland; Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, Texas; Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas; Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, California; HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota; School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana; Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York; Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York; Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Namrata Prasad, riz9@ 123456cdc.gov .
                Article
                mm7113e2
                10.15585/mmwr.mm7113e2
                8979598
                35358170
                dcb41ae4-7ee6-4836-adae-5a19056b8fa2

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                52
                1
                38
                0
                Smart Citations
                52
                1
                38
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,444

                Cited by27

                Most referenced authors146